src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js" type="text/javascript">
Now able to download Network, WiMax, Wireless, GSM, CDMA, EV-DO, UMTS, HSDPA, 3G Simulation tools from here:
OPNET 12 WIMAX MODULE :
Uploaded to Mediafire File Sharing Server
OPNET 12.0 WiMax.part1.rar
OPNET 12.0 WiMax.part2.rar
If you want and can charge for Opnet 14.5 with crack, contact with us tulgabat@gmail.com e-mail address.
Friday, January 16, 2009
DOWNLOAD WIMAX SIMULATION TOOLS
Sunday, December 28, 2008
YOTA LAUNCHES MOBILE WIMAX AND 4G IN RUSSIA
Scartel (brand Yota), a Russian provider of Mobile WiMAX, and HTC have launched the world’s first integrated GSM/WiMAX handset.
“Yota was established to provide a unique set of mobile communication services to millions of people in Russia and today we have launched the first device and services to realise its full potential,” said Denis Sverdlov, General Director of Yota’s parent company, Scartel LLC (brand Yota). “We really believe that these innovative services, high-speed Internet and stylish HTC MAX 4G will completely change the communications industry, just as the introduction of cellular communications did many years ago.”
The Yota Mobile WiMAX network offers high-speed wireless Internet access, and the Mobile WiMAX network with traffic prioritisation algorithms, allows online films, video and TV programmes to be viewed on the large WVGA screen.
Mobile WiMAX modems
All Mobile WiMAX devices
- Provide Internet access at speeds up to 10 Mbps within the Yota network coverage area.
- Have the pre-installed Yota Access program that helps establish Internet connection in a couple of minutes.
USB Modems
A USB modem can be used with either a notebook or a stationary computer.
A USB modem can be used with either a notebook or a stationary computer.
Mobile WiMAX USB Modem Samsung SWC-U200
Specifications:
| Host Interface | USB2.0 |
| Modulation | QPSK, 16/64QAM, OFDMA |
| Standard | IEEE 802.16e Wave 2 |
| Frequency Support | 2.5~2.7GHz |
| Output Power | 0,2 W |
| Power Supply | 2,5 W |
| Size | 70x27x14 mm |
| Weight | 25g |
Mobile WiMAX USB Modem ASUS WUSB25E2
Specifications:
| Host Interface | USB2.0 |
| Modulation | QPSK, 16/64QAM, OFDMA |
| Standard | IEEE 802.16e Wave 2 |
| Frequency Support | 2.5~2.7GHz |
| Output Power | 0,2 W |
| Power Supply | 2,5 W |
| Size | 105x36x10.6 mm |
| Weight | 70g |
ExpressCard Modems
The device is compatible with notebooks fitted by Express and PCMCIA slots.
Specifications:
| Host Interface | Express port |
| Modulation | QPSK, 16/64QAM, OFDMA |
| Standard | IEEE 802.16e Wave 2 |
| Frequency Support | 2.5~2.7GHz |
| Output Power | 0,2 W |
| Power Supply | 2,5 W |
| Size | 118x39,4x14 mm |
| Weight | 37,5g |
Broadcasting 14 free channels at launch and 23 channels by the end of 2008, Yota TV introduces a powerful mobile television experience. The vibrant, 3.8 inch 800x480 screen of the HTC MAX 4G can display up to nine TV channels simultaneously, allowing quick and easy channel surfing and programme selection. Thanks to the device’s TV-out capability, users can also watch content on the big screen, putting the HTC MAX 4G at the very heart of the mobile entertainment experience.
”The introduction of the HTC MAX 4G represents the culmination of a close partnership between HTC and Yota to develop the world’s first integrated mobile GSM/WIMAX handset,” said Peter Chou, CEO and President, HTC Corporation. “Russia is a key strategic market for HTC and Yota’s Mobile WiMAX network sets a new global benchmark for next-generation mobile services.”
The HTC MAX 4G supports GSM calls using a SIM card from any Russian network operator and when both callers are Yota subscribers, the call will automatically be routed as a VoIP call over the Yota Mobile WiMAX network.
HTC MAX 4G Specifications 
- Processor:Qualcomm® ESM7206A™ 528 MHz
- Platform:Windows Mobile® 6.1 Professional
- Memory:ROM: 288 MB, RAM: 288 MB, Flash: 8 GB, can be augmented with microSD cards
- Dimensions:113.5 mm × 63.1 mm × 13.9 mm
- Weight:151 gram (accumulator included)
- Display:3.8-inch TFT-LCD flat touch-sensitive screen with 480x800 WVGA resolution
- Network:Tri-band GSM/GPRS/EDGE: 900/1800/1900 MHz Yota Mobile WiMAX 2.5~2.7 GHz
- GPS:Built-in GPS receiver
- Connections:IEEE 802.16e (Mobile WiMAX) IEEE 802.11b/g (WiFi) Bluetooth 2.0 EDR HTC extUSB
- Main camera:High-resolution with autofocus
- Second:VGA-camera
- Additional:FM-radio Motion G-sensor, position sensitive interface display automatically assesses the surrounding light and changes its own brightness
- Memory cards: microSD (compatible with SD 2.0)
- Audio: Supported: AAC, AAC+, eAAC+, AMR-NB, AMR-WB, QCP, MP3, WMA, WAV, 40 polyphonic and standard MIDI format
- Battery: Li-Pol, 1500 mA⋅h
- Talk time: GSM: up to 420 minutes
- VoIP: up to 230 minutes
- Standby time: GSM: up to 350 hours
- VoIP: up to 50 hours
- AC Adapter: Voltage range/frequency: 100 ~ 240V AC, 50/60 Hz
EV-DO VS HSDPA VS WiMAX
With WiFi, laptop-toting road warriors were no longer tethered to cords for internet access. Cutting the cord, however, put the user at the mercy of finding a nearby Starbucks or other hotspot location, only partially providing the sense of freedom that users wanted. Eventually, cell phone companies realized providing high-speed data over cellular networks could be a major business boom, especially if the access could be relatively speedy. Now, we've got a few competing standards that can get you on the internet wirelessly, but there are a few gotchas with each standard. Read on as we break down the basics of wireless net access.
EV-DONational providers
Sprint and Verizon Maximum throughput speed:
Rev 0: 2.4 Mbps download, 153 Kbps upload
Rev A: 3.1 Mbps download, 1.8 Mbps upload
Pricing: $59.99 / month for Sprint & Verizon
EV-DO was one of the first acceptable-speed mobile internet acecss methods, and its tried and true approach to 3G data works effectively. Rather than being offered as a sort of wired broadband replacement, the pricey services from Sprint and Verizon are seen as more of an office broadband augmented luxury rather than a way to replace the home DSL service to which users have grown accustomed. EV-DO gets the job done in the mobile broadband department, and currently its what I use when I'm on the road (although through a tethered phone). However, take note of the 5GB download cap per month. If you're planning to use this as your primary connection and are any sort of power user, 5GB gets eaten up pretty quickly.
HSDPA / UMTS / EDGEProviders:
AT&T and T-MobileMaximum throughput speed:
HSDPA: 3.6 Mbps dowload, 1.2 Mbps upload
UMTS: 700 Kbps download, 500 Kbps upload
EDGE: 384 Kbps download, 236 Kbps upload
Provider bandwidth caps: AT&T: 5GB
T-Mobile: nonePricing:
$60 for HSDPA / UMTS on AT&T
$49.99 for EDGE / HSDPA (coming soon) on T-Mobile
Though it's coming late to the game, 3G connection through AT&T and T-Mobile could end up being more appealing than EV-DO. The primary reason? Speed. EV-DO isn't seeing nearly as much speed increase as HSDPA and UMTS. However, the biggest problem with current implementations by AT&T and T-Mobile is that the network coverage is rather spotty. EV-DO access stretches nearly nationwide, and Sprint and Verizon have roaming agreements on each others' networks, meaning there are few EV-DO deadspots. HSDPA and UMTS, however, started rolling out slowly after EV-DO, and haven't yet caught up. In fact, T-Mobile literally just started rolling out its 3G network in August 2008, and its technology isn't cross compatible with AT&T's technology, due to some differences in implementation -- meaning T-Mobile and AT&T high-speed users can't roam on each other's networks for increased coverage.
HSDPA and UMTS are in their infancy still, so if you're in an area (or travelling frequently to an area) with good mobile broadband coverage with UMTS / HSDPA and are looking for higher speeds than EV-DO, it might be worth a look. However, do some coverage area research before plunking down the cash. Be aware that the 5GB download cap still applies, too.
WiMAXProvider
Sprint XOHMMaximum throughput speed:
5 Mbps download, 2.6 Mbps upload
Provider bandwidth caps:
No caps on bandwidth
Pricing:
$35 / month for "home"
$45 / month for "on the go"
$65 / month for combo
$10 / single day access
The least widespread but most exciting high-speed data technology is WiMAX. While currently it's only deployed using Sprint's XOHM network in Baltimore, this up and coming technology shows the most forward looking promise of any of the cellular data options. Currently, the throughput speeds are around 5 Mbps, but WiMAX has a forward looking approach that'll have higher speeds as the netowrk continues to be deployed. Remember those 5GB bandwidth caps of UMTS/ HSDPA and EV-DO? WiMAX doesn't have them. Sprint says the real story behind WiMAX is the capacity story, rather than the high-speed story, in that the architecture behind WiMAX allows providers to more efficiently manage the network, thereby allowing people to use it as their primary internet access method. Sprint's bargain basement pricing for the Baltimore-exclusive WiMAX rollout looks very inviting, however those of us outside of 'Monument City' will be stuck waiting for WiMAX rollouts nationwide over the next few years.
Other notes
Some laptops, like many in Sony's Vaio series, include built-in mobile broadband without having to plug in an external device. These notebooks will work with a specific network type, and you'll have to contact your provider to figure out how to sync up the laptop with the network.
Also, while we're mainly focusing on adding broadband to laptops, many of the service providers listed also offer some form of "tethering" to cell phones, meaning your phone turns into the modem. Often times these plans are less expensive than the plans we've outlined above, but you'll again have to check with your provider to see if your phone is compatible.
INTEL WIMAX CORE i7 CHIP
Intel senior vice president Anand Chandrasekher, speaking Monday at IDF, said that Intel will collaborate with Ericsson for High Speed Packet Access (HSPA) data modules for the Moorestown platform. WiMax is also supported, but it faces stiff competition from entrenched wireless technologies and may not be compelling enough to rise above the fray.
In addition to WiMax and HSPA, other wireless technologies including WiFi, GPS, Bluetooth, and mobile TV will be supported on Moorestown, Intel said.
Moorestown is a system-on-a-chip (SOC) comprised of "Lincroft," which integrates a 45-nanometer processor, graphics, memory controller, and video encode/decode onto a single chip. It also includes an "I/O hub" code-named Langwell that supports connection to wireless, storage, and display components.
Intel was also showing a number of slides that detail its upcoming Nehalem i7 processor and the accompanying X58 chipset. Intel said last week that Nehalem is shipping now and is due to be officially rolled out in November.
The i7 will initially appear as a quad-core processor and feature QuickPath Interconnect--a high-speed chip-to-chip communications technology--and "Turbo Boost," which had been referred to previously as "Turbo Mode." This is essentially a switch that turns off unused processor cores and then uses the remaining active cores more efficiently.
In Taipei, Intel also delineated the differences between Atom-based "Nettop" desktops and more mainstream desktop PCs. Intel is trying to promote Nettops for Web browsing, word processing, e-mail, and "legacy" games. Anything more taxing than these basic applications is not recommended for Nettops.
Intel Core i7 and x58 chipset features.
(Credit: Intel)
Intel Atom-based Nettop desktop.
(Credit: Intel)Monday, November 24, 2008
WIMAX TRANSMISSION POWER
As designers turn their attention to mobile WiMAX devices, they are quickly learning that there are some specific design challenges regarding power amplifiers. For Wave 2 mobile WiMAX products, the mobile device needs to efficiently deliver +23 dBm output power with high linearity from a 3.3 VDC supply.
Managing power in mobile WiMAX is quickly shaping up to be vitally important as first-generation designs are tested and deployed. One of the challenges of designing for mobile WiMAX is its long range, since WiMAX networks typically achieve coverage of about 1 km per cell.
To achieve these ranges, WiMAX must have an optimized power profile—from the base station right down to the components in the mobile device. High transmit power, then, is important. But how high can WiMAX go and what are the limitations imposed by regulatory bodies, technological limits, and usage models?
Designers of the power amplifier (PA) and those selecting PAs need to find the optimal balance between high power and high efficiency in order to ensure robust links, high data rates, and good range for their WiMAX services.
The nature of WiMAXWhat makes WiMAX challenging for designers is that it is an access technology with a unique set of constraints. As a result, power amplification circuits that were used for cellular or Wi-Fi applications cannot simply be dropped into WiMAX designs and tweaked to perform adequately.
In many ways, WiMAX can be considered a hybrid technology because it shares aspects of both cellular and Wi-Fi networks. Mobile WiMAX is very similar to cellular; it is meant to be used in highly mobile devices and it uses licensed frequency bands (so users expect high reliability). It also employs transmit power control techniques, much like CDMA cellular does.
However, it differs from cellular because it operates at much higher data rates (resulting in more stringent linearity requirements) and must simultaneously handle voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP), data, and video transmissions. Managing the bandwidth and priority of transmission for these types of services requires a quality of service (QoS) component that is not required for mobile voice alone.
On the other hand, WiMAX is also similar to Wi-Fi. For instance, it offers high data rates, uses orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) with modulations from BPSK to 64-QAM, and is an all-IP-based network.
However, it differs from Wi-Fi because it uses a fully-scheduled service, unlike the collision-based carrier sense multiple access (CSMA) technique used by Wi-Fi. This gives WiMAX a significant advantage over Wi-Fi.
As the number of users increases in a CSMA network, overall capacity drops dramatically since each collision requires a subsequent retransmission. With a scheduled service, overall network capacity is unaffected as the number of users increases, since the basestation manages each user's access to the network efficiently.
WiMAX network coverageWi-Fi networks typically cover ranges that are measured in the tens or hundreds of meters for each access point (AP). However, WiMAX networks will achieve coverage of about 1 km per BS. In order to achieve this, mobile WiMAX networks employ a number of techniques to achieve longer range, including high transmit power, subchannelization, and adaptive modulation.
Simply put, RF power translates directly into range, so higher power equals longer range. To achieve long range, WiMAX basestations transmit at power levels of approximately +43dBm (20W), as compared to Wi-Fi APs, which typically transmit at +18 dBm (60 mW).
A WiMAX mobile station (MS) typically transmits at +23 dBm (200mW), as compared to +18 dBm (60 mW) for Wi-Fi. Cellular (CDMA) transmit powers for both the BS and MS are similar to those used in WiMAX.
However, because WiMAX uses much higher modulation orders to achieve higher throughput, WiMAX requires a much better SNR than cellular. For the mobile transmitter, high modulation orders require a PA with much better linearity and greatly complicates PA design compared to GSM or CDMA.
You might notice that there is a large difference (approximately 20 dB) between downlink power (from the BS to the MS) and uplink power (from the MS to the BS), so mobile WiMAX networks are severely uplink limited (this is also the case for cellular networks, of course).
This means that, while a mobile can easily receive transmissions from a BS, the mobile's relatively low transmit power makes it difficult for the BS to hear it.
One way to combat this mismatch is by using a technique called subchannelization, where only a subset of all of the available subchannels is used for any particular user.
In effect, each mobile concentrates its power over a smaller range of frequencies, and the net signal gain is 10*log(Ntotal/Nused), where Nused is the number of subcarriers assigned to the user, and Ntotal is the total number of subcarriers available.
For example, if a user is assigned one subchannel made up of 24 subcarriers, the net gain that is achieved relative to the BS that is transmitting on all 841 allocated subcarriers is 10*log(841/24)=15.4 dB. The other subcarriers are made available to other users, and they can use these simultaneously.
Another technique to address the link imbalance is adaptive modulation. In this case, the mobile transmits using a lower order modulation compared to the BS. For example, the mobile could transmit QPSK or 16QAM signals, while the BS transmits using 64QAM.
Because the SNR required to receive QPSK or 16QAM is lower than 64QAM, using a lower order modulation allows the MS to communicate with the BS using less transmit power (although uplink throughput is reduced, since fewer bits are transmitted per subcarrier with lower order modulation).
For example, the SNR required for QPSK-1/2 is 5 dB as compared to 10.5 dB for 16QAM-1/2 and 20 dB for 64QAM-3/4 modulation1. If the MS transmits with QPSK, the BS can tolerate 5.5 dB more link loss than with 16QAM.
When sub-channelization and adaptive modulation are combined, a network operator can effectively balance the uplink and downlink budgets, and the network will operate bi-directionally.
The downside is that when these techniques are used, the uplink throughput will be lower than the downlink throughput; subchannelization limits the number of subcarriers available for mobile transmission, and lower order modulation means that fewer bits are transmitted on each available subcarrier.
Simply put, RF power translates directly into range, so higher power equals longer range. To achieve long range, WiMAX basestations transmit at power levels of approximately +43dBm (20W), as compared to Wi-Fi APs, which typically transmit at +18 dBm (60 mW).
A WiMAX mobile station (MS) typically transmits at +23 dBm (200mW), as compared to +18 dBm (60 mW) for Wi-Fi. Cellular (CDMA) transmit powers for both the BS and MS are similar to those used in WiMAX.
However, because WiMAX uses much higher modulation orders to achieve higher throughput, WiMAX requires a much better SNR than cellular. For the mobile transmitter, high modulation orders require a PA with much better linearity and greatly complicates PA design compared to GSM or CDMA.
You might notice that there is a large difference (approximately 20 dB) between downlink power (from the BS to the MS) and uplink power (from the MS to the BS), so mobile WiMAX networks are severely uplink limited (this is also the case for cellular networks, of course).
This means that, while a mobile can easily receive transmissions from a BS, the mobile's relatively low transmit power makes it difficult for the BS to hear it.
One way to combat this mismatch is by using a technique called subchannelization, where only a subset of all of the available subchannels is used for any particular user.
In effect, each mobile concentrates its power over a smaller range of frequencies, and the net signal gain is 10*log(Ntotal/Nused), where Nused is the number of subcarriers assigned to the user, and Ntotal is the total number of subcarriers available.
For example, if a user is assigned one subchannel made up of 24 subcarriers, the net gain that is achieved relative to the BS that is transmitting on all 841 allocated subcarriers is 10*log(841/24)=15.4 dB. The other subcarriers are made available to other users, and they can use these simultaneously.
Another technique to address the link imbalance is adaptive modulation. In this case, the mobile transmits using a lower order modulation compared to the BS. For example, the mobile could transmit QPSK or 16QAM signals, while the BS transmits using 64QAM.
Because the SNR required to receive QPSK or 16QAM is lower than 64QAM, using a lower order modulation allows the MS to communicate with the BS using less transmit power (although uplink throughput is reduced, since fewer bits are transmitted per subcarrier with lower order modulation).
For example, the SNR required for QPSK-1/2 is 5 dB as compared to 10.5 dB for 16QAM-1/2 and 20 dB for 64QAM-3/4 modulation1. If the MS transmits with QPSK, the BS can tolerate 5.5 dB more link loss than with 16QAM.
When sub-channelization and adaptive modulation are combined, a network operator can effectively balance the uplink and downlink budgets, and the network will operate bi-directionally.
The downside is that when these techniques are used, the uplink throughput will be lower than the downlink throughput; subchannelization limits the number of subcarriers available for mobile transmission, and lower order modulation means that fewer bits are transmitted on each available subcarrier.
Power profile of a mobile WiMAX cellWith all of the above explanations in mind, let's examine what the transmit power profile looks like across a WiMAX cell. A common misconception is that mobile stations transmit at maximum power only at the edge of a cell, and at lower power when mobiles are closer to the BS. In reality, this is not the case; mobile stations will transmit at high powers over a range of distances.
To understand why this is the case, consider a mobile device moving from the edge of the cell directly towards the BS. When it is at the extreme cell edge, path loss will be very large, so the mobile device will be transmitting at maximum power with the most robust modulation.
As a result, uplink data rates will be relatively low. However, with the high MS transmit power and robust modulation, the BS will be able to receive transmissions from the MS, and the link is sound.
As the mobile moves closer to the BS, path loss decreases. The signal level at the BS increases, and the SNR improves, since the received signal is now farther above the noise floor.
In response, the BS may instruct the mobile to start reducing power (to minimize potential for interference between different mobile stations). However, as soon as the signal level supports a higher order modulation, the BS will instruct the mobile to switch modulations in order to increase overall network capacity.
Going back to our example comparing QPSK and 16QAM, suppose a transmitter operates at +23 dBm and it just achieves the 5 dB SNR required for QPSK when it is at the edge of the cell. As is moves closer to the BS, path loss drops, and the BS may ask the MS to reduce its transmit power.
However, as soon as the path loss has decreased by 5.5 dB, the BS will instruct the MS to switch to 16QAM-1/2, and will increase transmit power back to +23 dBm, since the MS will now be able to achieve a 10.5 dB SNR. Therefore, a mobile will typically transmit at higher powers until it is close enough to the BS to achieve 16QAM operation (or even 64QAM in many instances), at which point power is reduced. This is shown in Figure 1.
Click here for Figure 1.Figure 1: Achievable modulation versus distance with +23 dBm transmit power.
To understand why this is the case, consider a mobile device moving from the edge of the cell directly towards the BS. When it is at the extreme cell edge, path loss will be very large, so the mobile device will be transmitting at maximum power with the most robust modulation.
As a result, uplink data rates will be relatively low. However, with the high MS transmit power and robust modulation, the BS will be able to receive transmissions from the MS, and the link is sound.
As the mobile moves closer to the BS, path loss decreases. The signal level at the BS increases, and the SNR improves, since the received signal is now farther above the noise floor.
In response, the BS may instruct the mobile to start reducing power (to minimize potential for interference between different mobile stations). However, as soon as the signal level supports a higher order modulation, the BS will instruct the mobile to switch modulations in order to increase overall network capacity.
Going back to our example comparing QPSK and 16QAM, suppose a transmitter operates at +23 dBm and it just achieves the 5 dB SNR required for QPSK when it is at the edge of the cell. As is moves closer to the BS, path loss drops, and the BS may ask the MS to reduce its transmit power.
However, as soon as the path loss has decreased by 5.5 dB, the BS will instruct the MS to switch to 16QAM-1/2, and will increase transmit power back to +23 dBm, since the MS will now be able to achieve a 10.5 dB SNR. Therefore, a mobile will typically transmit at higher powers until it is close enough to the BS to achieve 16QAM operation (or even 64QAM in many instances), at which point power is reduced. This is shown in Figure 1.
Click here for Figure 1.Figure 1: Achievable modulation versus distance with +23 dBm transmit power.
Figure 1 was derived using parameters from a WiMAX Forum whitepaper2. It shows the modulation that is achievable as a function of distance from the BS. We use the parameters in the whitepaper, so, for example, maximum available path loss is calculated assuming a 10 MHz channel bandwidth at 2.5 GHz, with 3 subchannels, and 10 dB penetration loss.
In calculating the path loss, we have assumed a COST231 suburban model at 2.5 GHz with 32 m BS height and 1.2m MS height. This analysis has assumed the presence of slow (lognormal) fading, but is somewhat simplified, since we assume a fixed 5.5 dB fade margin.
In reality, of course, fading is a random process, and closed loop power control will be used to help mitigate its effects. However, for the sake of this analysis, the conclusions are valid, as fading will simply blur the boundaries between the different modulations.
Note that the red ring, labeled QPSK-1/8 represents QPSK-1/2 modulation with a repetition factor of 4. This is the most robust modulation scheme, and it can be seen that it is indeed required at maximum range.
In our analysis, we calculate that with +23 dBm transmit power, an MS must use QPSK-1/8 for mobiles from 0.9 km to 1.35km from the BS. At closer distances, the MS is able to use higher order modulations, and network capacity is therefore increased.
For example, the MS is able to use 16QAM-1/2 modulation at distances from 0.45 to 0.6 km from the BS. Since 16QAM-1/2 modulation transmits 2 bits per symbol, while QPSK-1/8 transmits only 0.5 bits per symbol, one can see that the throughput in the green ring is 4 times higher than in the red ring.
We can also estimate the required transmit power as a function of range. At the edge of each of the zones in Figure 1, the MS will be transmitting at maximum power. It will decrease its transmit power as it moves towards the BS, until it has sufficient power to achieve the next modulation order.
At this time, it will increase transmit power again to maximize capacity.
Figure 2 shows the expected transmit power as a function of distance, showing the impact of adaptive modulation. It can be seen that transmit power is significantly reduced only once the maximum modulation order has been achieved, which in this case is 64QAM-3/4.
Click here for Figure 2.Figure 2:
Transmit power versus distance from basestation.
If the maximum modulation order was instead 16QAM-3/4, then the transmit power would be monotonically reduced once the 16QAM-3/4 rate was achieved.
It should be noted that the presence of fading will result in significant changes to this curve. In a real-life fading environment, additional margin may be required to counteract fading effects, and one would expect that transmitting at maximum power would occur less frequently.
However, the overall trend shown in Figure 2 is correct, and shows that mobile stations will be required to transmit at high powers not only at the cell edges, but also at much closer distances in order to achieve higher-order modulation.
If the maximum modulation order was instead 16QAM-3/4, then the transmit power would be monotonically reduced once the 16QAM-3/4 rate was achieved.
It should be noted that the presence of fading will result in significant changes to this curve. In a real-life fading environment, additional margin may be required to counteract fading effects, and one would expect that transmitting at maximum power would occur less frequently.
However, the overall trend shown in Figure 2 is correct, and shows that mobile stations will be required to transmit at high powers not only at the cell edges, but also at much closer distances in order to achieve higher-order modulation.
Benefits of high powerThe benefits of higher power transmission from the mobile WiMAX terminal are significant. Consider the effect of increasing the transmit power by 40%, from +23 dBm (200mW) to +24.5 dBm (281 mW). First, it would require a larger power amplifier (PA). Assuming that losses after the PA are 1 dB, the output power from the PA must increase from 250 mW (+24 dBm) to 355mW (+25.5 dBm).
There are two benefits to transmitting at higher power. First, transmitting at this higher output power increases the maximum range. Using parameters from the WiMAX Forum 3, maximum mobile to BS distance is increased from 1.35 to 1.5 km when the output power is increased from 23 to 24.5 dBm, so that the overall coverage area increases by 23.5%.
In principle, one might expect that a network operator could deploy 23 percent fewer base stations, and realize a cost savings. However, this effect may be of only limited benefit, since many networks will have been designed with cell sizes assuming +23 dBm uplink transmit power, so cell sizes may already be fixed.
The second benefit is more significant, however. If an MS is able to transmit at higher power, then it can achieve the SNR required for higher order modulation when it is further from the BS. This improves overall network capacity, so increases overall spectral efficiency.
Figure 3 shows the modulation that is achievable as a function of distance from the BS with +24.5 dBm transmit power.
Click here for Figure 3.Figure 3:
There are two benefits to transmitting at higher power. First, transmitting at this higher output power increases the maximum range. Using parameters from the WiMAX Forum 3, maximum mobile to BS distance is increased from 1.35 to 1.5 km when the output power is increased from 23 to 24.5 dBm, so that the overall coverage area increases by 23.5%.
In principle, one might expect that a network operator could deploy 23 percent fewer base stations, and realize a cost savings. However, this effect may be of only limited benefit, since many networks will have been designed with cell sizes assuming +23 dBm uplink transmit power, so cell sizes may already be fixed.
The second benefit is more significant, however. If an MS is able to transmit at higher power, then it can achieve the SNR required for higher order modulation when it is further from the BS. This improves overall network capacity, so increases overall spectral efficiency.
Figure 3 shows the modulation that is achievable as a function of distance from the BS with +24.5 dBm transmit power.
Click here for Figure 3.Figure 3:
Achievable modulation versus distance with +24.5 dBm transmit power.
In this figure, we again plot achievable modulation as a function of distance from the BS (and the dashed lines show the ranges for +23 dBm from Figure 1 for reference). Note that the maximum distance has increased from 1.35 to 1.5 km, as discussed above.
However, it is more important to note that users can now achieve higher order modulations over a wider range. For example, for 16QAM-1/2 modulation the maximum range is now 0.7 km, versus 0.6 km for +23 dBm.
As a result, each user will achieve higher throughput over a wider range, and the network aggregate capacity will be increased accordingly. With every additional user who can transmit at a higher power level, overall network capacity increases.
It is important to understand that all users would need to transmit at a higher transmit power in order to allow cell sizes to expand. However, each and every higher power user added to the network increases overall network capacity.
Finally, it is relatively straightforward to calculate the capacity increase seen by increasing transmit power from +23 to +24.5 dBm. We know how many bits per symbol can be transmitted for each modulation scheme, and we know the relative areas that can be covered for each modulation scheme, for both power levels.
When this information is used to calculate relative capacity, we find that it increases by 24% when transmit power is increased from +23 dBm to +24.5 dBm.
Even if the maximum cell size remains fixed at 1.35km when the transmit power is increased to +24.5 dBm (as would be the case if networks were rolled out assuming +23 dBm devices) the capacity still increases by 18% when devices are able to transmit at higher power.
In this figure, we again plot achievable modulation as a function of distance from the BS (and the dashed lines show the ranges for +23 dBm from Figure 1 for reference). Note that the maximum distance has increased from 1.35 to 1.5 km, as discussed above.
However, it is more important to note that users can now achieve higher order modulations over a wider range. For example, for 16QAM-1/2 modulation the maximum range is now 0.7 km, versus 0.6 km for +23 dBm.
As a result, each user will achieve higher throughput over a wider range, and the network aggregate capacity will be increased accordingly. With every additional user who can transmit at a higher power level, overall network capacity increases.
It is important to understand that all users would need to transmit at a higher transmit power in order to allow cell sizes to expand. However, each and every higher power user added to the network increases overall network capacity.
Finally, it is relatively straightforward to calculate the capacity increase seen by increasing transmit power from +23 to +24.5 dBm. We know how many bits per symbol can be transmitted for each modulation scheme, and we know the relative areas that can be covered for each modulation scheme, for both power levels.
When this information is used to calculate relative capacity, we find that it increases by 24% when transmit power is increased from +23 dBm to +24.5 dBm.
Even if the maximum cell size remains fixed at 1.35km when the transmit power is increased to +24.5 dBm (as would be the case if networks were rolled out assuming +23 dBm devices) the capacity still increases by 18% when devices are able to transmit at higher power.
Limitations of powerSo, now we understand why higher transmit power is important in a WiMAX network; it allows overall network throughput to increase, and in a 'greenfield' deployment, it would allow for larger cell sizes, and therefore reduce deployment costs.
So why not transmit even more power? There are three important factors that limit our ability to transmit at higher power: PA efficiency, available supply voltage, and regulatory requirements.
PA efficiencyIn PAs, efficiency is the measure of the RF power out versus the DC power in. For example, if a PA has a 10 percent efficiency, it would consume 3.55 W to transmit at +25.5dBm (355 mW). If the PA efficiency could be doubled to 20 percent, then the peak power consumption drops to 1.7W.
Today's state-of-the-art WiMAX PAs, like SiGe Semiconductor's SE7262, operate with >20 percent efficiency (See sidebar Why is PA efficiency so low for WiMAX?.)
The PA efficiency has a direct impact on battery life for mobile devices. Of course, the PA is not working all of the time, so the average power consumption will be considerably lower than the peak power consumption quoted above.
For instance, transmit duty cycles for WiMAX devices are typically about 40 percent when the MS has data to transmit. Therefore the average power consumption for a 20 percent efficiency PA will be about 680 mW if the PA is transmitting at maximum power.
Furthermore, often there will be no data to transmit, and in this case, the device will transmit very infrequently (essentially, it transmits only ranging messages to let the BS know that it is still in the cell).
In the end, however, the PA power consumption can have a significant impact on battery life, and it is important that PA efficiency is as high as possible.
Available supply voltageMobile WiMAX devices will be powered directly from the mobile station's battery, and battery supply voltages vary significantly during use. When freshly charged, the battery will operate at about 4.8V.
The supply voltage drops as the battery discharges, and the minimum practical supply voltage before the device shuts down is typically 2.7V. Most manufacturers want to use the battery for as much of this range as possible, and therefore specify that the power amplifier must faithfully deliver fully rated power at 3.3V (and occasionally 3.0 V).
Delivering high power under these conditions imposes some significant challenges. As most circuit designers know, a low supply voltage requires a high current, which implies a very low output impedance. Consequently, matching the low impedance PA output to a 50 Ohm antenna is difficult to achieve.
If higher output powers are required, the impedance becomes even lower, and it becomes increasingly difficult to achieve a good broadband match between the PA and the antenna.
Regulatory requirementsRegulatory requirements also place a serious constraint on how much power a PA can deliver. An ideal linear PA produces only the original frequency from the input signal. In real-world implementations, PA non-linearities introduce new frequencies through intermodulation distortion (IMD), and these out-of-band signals can interfere with users in adjacent channels (referred to as spectral regrowth or spectral leakage).
Regulatory bodies have imposed strict regulations on the amount of power that can be emitted out of band. For example, for mobile devices in the 2.5GHz band, the FCC specifies4 that the emissions must be below -25 dBm/MHz, measured 5.5MHz outside the device's assigned band.
Since this limit is an absolute power measurement, as output power is increased, more and more rejection of out-of-band emissions is required, and the power amplifier must be made more and more linear.
For example, when transmitting at +23 dBm with a 10 MHz channel bandwidth, achieving -25 dBm/MHz requires a net rejection of 23-10log(10)+25=38 dB rejection. Transmitting at 24.5 dBm requires 39.5 dB rejection.
Therefore, it becomes increasingly difficult to meet regulatory requirements as output power is increased. To reduce IMD distortion, the PA must operate more linearly, and the result is that PA efficiency will drop as the output power target is increased.
Recognizing the Tradeoffs Undoubtedly, higher transmit power is important for mobile WiMAX networks. Networks are currently being deployed specifying that the minimum transmit power is +23 dBm.
Each user who enters a network transmitting at powers greater than +23 dBm increases overall network efficiency. However, delivering higher transmit powers comes at a cost to power consumption. As a result, power amplifier efficiency becomes more important as higher output powers are used.
So why not transmit even more power? There are three important factors that limit our ability to transmit at higher power: PA efficiency, available supply voltage, and regulatory requirements.
PA efficiencyIn PAs, efficiency is the measure of the RF power out versus the DC power in. For example, if a PA has a 10 percent efficiency, it would consume 3.55 W to transmit at +25.5dBm (355 mW). If the PA efficiency could be doubled to 20 percent, then the peak power consumption drops to 1.7W.
Today's state-of-the-art WiMAX PAs, like SiGe Semiconductor's SE7262, operate with >20 percent efficiency (See sidebar Why is PA efficiency so low for WiMAX?.)
The PA efficiency has a direct impact on battery life for mobile devices. Of course, the PA is not working all of the time, so the average power consumption will be considerably lower than the peak power consumption quoted above.
For instance, transmit duty cycles for WiMAX devices are typically about 40 percent when the MS has data to transmit. Therefore the average power consumption for a 20 percent efficiency PA will be about 680 mW if the PA is transmitting at maximum power.
Furthermore, often there will be no data to transmit, and in this case, the device will transmit very infrequently (essentially, it transmits only ranging messages to let the BS know that it is still in the cell).
In the end, however, the PA power consumption can have a significant impact on battery life, and it is important that PA efficiency is as high as possible.
Available supply voltageMobile WiMAX devices will be powered directly from the mobile station's battery, and battery supply voltages vary significantly during use. When freshly charged, the battery will operate at about 4.8V.
The supply voltage drops as the battery discharges, and the minimum practical supply voltage before the device shuts down is typically 2.7V. Most manufacturers want to use the battery for as much of this range as possible, and therefore specify that the power amplifier must faithfully deliver fully rated power at 3.3V (and occasionally 3.0 V).
Delivering high power under these conditions imposes some significant challenges. As most circuit designers know, a low supply voltage requires a high current, which implies a very low output impedance. Consequently, matching the low impedance PA output to a 50 Ohm antenna is difficult to achieve.
If higher output powers are required, the impedance becomes even lower, and it becomes increasingly difficult to achieve a good broadband match between the PA and the antenna.
Regulatory requirementsRegulatory requirements also place a serious constraint on how much power a PA can deliver. An ideal linear PA produces only the original frequency from the input signal. In real-world implementations, PA non-linearities introduce new frequencies through intermodulation distortion (IMD), and these out-of-band signals can interfere with users in adjacent channels (referred to as spectral regrowth or spectral leakage).
Regulatory bodies have imposed strict regulations on the amount of power that can be emitted out of band. For example, for mobile devices in the 2.5GHz band, the FCC specifies4 that the emissions must be below -25 dBm/MHz, measured 5.5MHz outside the device's assigned band.
Since this limit is an absolute power measurement, as output power is increased, more and more rejection of out-of-band emissions is required, and the power amplifier must be made more and more linear.
For example, when transmitting at +23 dBm with a 10 MHz channel bandwidth, achieving -25 dBm/MHz requires a net rejection of 23-10log(10)+25=38 dB rejection. Transmitting at 24.5 dBm requires 39.5 dB rejection.
Therefore, it becomes increasingly difficult to meet regulatory requirements as output power is increased. To reduce IMD distortion, the PA must operate more linearly, and the result is that PA efficiency will drop as the output power target is increased.
Recognizing the Tradeoffs Undoubtedly, higher transmit power is important for mobile WiMAX networks. Networks are currently being deployed specifying that the minimum transmit power is +23 dBm.
Each user who enters a network transmitting at powers greater than +23 dBm increases overall network efficiency. However, delivering higher transmit powers comes at a cost to power consumption. As a result, power amplifier efficiency becomes more important as higher output powers are used.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
